Forums IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ Abundance for Life, Effortless Success neo tech

I recently received a junk mail invitation from Neuvue Tech to join their secret society and the person writing me had a secret identity. My name was passed on to them by someone highly regarded and thought I would fit in with their organization.

Any organization that has to operate under the guize of secrecy these days, or the pretense of secrecy is doing something wrong.
If it was legite they would not need to hide in the shadows.

Believe me, it is much easier to operate within the rules.

I bought the Neo-Tech book 12 years ago or so. I wasn't sure if it was a strait out scam or just the ramblings of a madman. As I remember, there is a ton of circular logic, doublespeak, obfusecation and unneccesary vocabulary. It was difficult to find even a shred of useful information.

In essence, the Neo-Tech plan is a loose rip off of Ayn Rand's Objectivism philosophy. You're better off going to a bookstore and buying every one of her books than one Neo-Tech one. At least you'll have something solid to believe or not believe in. (and I say that as a person who does not neccesarily agree with Objectivism at all.)

I purchased Neo Tech in 1984 and have been fan until the mid 90’s. I purchased
a lot of the Neo Tech literature and even went to two Neo Tech summits in Las
Vegas.

So I know Dr. Wallace and most of his co-workers personally.(meeting them at the
Summit)
I agree that N-T is to a large degree a rephrasing of Ayn Rand’s Objectivism but it is much broader and goes much deeper then Objectivism.

What did I learn from N-T?

• I know what a neocheater is and how those people operate. I know how to
avoid them.

• I learnt integrated thinking, connected thinking which alone provides a great advantage because hardly anyone does it.

• I got rid of a lot of unearned guilt feelings indoctrinated by neocheaters such as the media, some teachers, the church and even some relatives.
•
The reason why I dropped Neo-Tech or distanced myself from it was that it is based on some beliefs which are called axiomatic. (not to be questioned and self evident)
Those beliefs are limiting integrated thinking because they can only integrate within the boundaries of those beliefs.

OK, so can you define Integrated Thinking?
That seems to be the jewel in all of this for you.

This is what I found at the Neo-Tech Site.

"Integrated thinking is the conscious effort of putting information into accurate context by logically and honestly connecting all relevant knowledge. All valid and powerful knowledge is contextual."

[This message has been edited by NeoZon (edited August 19, 2005).]

That would seem quite accurate in it's application.

Thank you

Jeff

I bougth the Neo Tech a few years ago. Simply said, it is the only book I have dumped in the trash after looking at a few pages in it.

Statik,

Why didn't you return it for a refund?