Forums IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ Genius Code What to describe

Hi, I have a question on how do describe the image stream. Usually my stream is very clear and fast. And as they instruct in the course I should describe it very detailed. The probleam is that when I have said one sentence I`ve seen enough images to describe for 20 minutes. So I do not know what to do? should I just describe as fast I can and go along with the stream (less detailed) or should I continue to describe the firs images shown to me even thoug the image has gone and been replaced with new ones?

I also have another question. Often when I see an image new images is created from what I assosiate with the first one, like a chain of thoughts is followed by the first image. This often happens in the begining of the session and later it seems like images appear more independent from each other ( as I know consiously) is this later stage then more efficient or how can I understand this? any ideas?
Gauthe

Once the image goes start describing the new one. Describe as quickly as you can but stay with the present image. Take the changes of image to be a cue that you have described it enough because something triggered a change in image.

All the images are relevant. The later ones may just be giving you the same answer again in a different way. I've noticed the same "story told 3 different ways in an image stream but they all followed the same pattern. All you have is more cues and clues toward your answer when it comes to decoding. The early images are just as relevant.

Alex