Hi,
I agree that it all gets down to advertising.
Like... how can I put it? I remember reading in the "photoreading" section of this forum about how someone was complaining about photoreading and how it didn't deliver a single key to "pow! instantly gain complete knowledge of everything you photoread!", which is EXACTLY what the advertising indicates that it could do. So who is in the wrong here? The consumer who is disappointed with the actual results from the actual method not meeting his expectations? Or is the people who created the advirtising with the specific intention of creating those feelings and ideas?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not attacking Photoreading, just using it as an example. The same thing applies to Holosync, but far more. Go to thier homepage and read through the sale's pitch. Does he even mention overwhelm? Or the severity of the temporary negative effects of Holosyns, like losing jobs, regaining speach impediments, and hundreds of other things that the support team at Centerpointe take for granted. The point is, if there is a problem then I would personally say that it is self imposed. I mean, honestly, Bill Haris has by far and enough money and experience to create a program far more effective than the one he has; with even a fraction of the profit he has generated so far he could make it universally effective. He could add silent affermations to help people through overwhelm, or stop it completely. There are hundreds of other things too, of course. Anyway, like I say, I think that the only problem is self imposed; through the way people are positioned to recieve the product, and through the fact that they are still working with technology from the 80's.
[This message has been edited by genuismonkey (edited May 27, 2005).]
