Jens:
I read you! (no pun, here--well, not much!)
In any event, I think it's fair to say that, while your viewpoint encompasses the perspective Kuhn suggests, his position remains somewhat radical with the concept that opposes objective scientific truth.
As I said, I don't know that I'd go as far as he does in implying that truth is relative and dependent upon the prevailing paradigm. The exercise here was to present an argument based on a reasonable comprehension of Kuhn's book that was gained almost entirely through the PR techniques.
This isn't a hardcore physics text, but it's not light reading either. While I don't have full comprehension, I was amazed at how much I'd retained after my first superreading pass once I began on the second one.
This kind of empirical evidence is personal and somewhat subjective--no electrodes or standardized tests--but it's enough for me to say that PR works. I've satisfied my curiosity about that.
--George
