Brian649, you and many others constantly give /reply with "pragmatic arguments" (aka I don't care, I know it works), they are testimonials. I am not out to change your mind Brian649 (you are a true believer in science/skeptic lingo), as I said before, but to give the other side of the argument. Also, I was hoping for evidence/reports available on this board but that hope has died in the mean time. For me a scientific based study/observations of the system would be ideal. I cannot rely on testimonials (like your personal experience) being accurate. Besides, how do I measure your testimonials, they all pretty much say the same thing - it works. I don't have any numbers, or statistics on what worked! Did your comprehension increase, speed increase, what? How was it measured? A scientific study could measure these things, and at least compare it to reading and speed reading. Also, photoreading I am told often enough is a theory. As far as I know all theories are testable somehow(otherwise it would be speculation only)- so why not a scientific test to PRing? Anyway, if people would like to contribute to validating/proving PRing theory why not (instead of testimonials) volunteer for participation in independent scientific studies where they can measure your results!
I don't need to know everything about something before I use it either. But I know enough scams are out there, so I won't be blinded by promises. And I also tried the system like I said often enough.
As a final note, I am not interested in your digestive system so discussing your intake (diet) and output (evacuations) analogies are pretty much lost on me 
[This message has been edited by chaosadelt (edited April 09, 2001).]
