chaos, y dont u conduct the test? . there r enough photoreaders, speed readers & whatmore in this world that u can contact. im sure almost any1 will b happy 2 donate from his experience 2 ur research. (forums,usenet & icq ofcourse. heck build a site & use some cgi script its ez) just do ur stuff & gather information if thats what u wanted. its more than adequate 4 showing true statistics . still i dont think any1 in here really cares about it
. as u c, when some1 does something with less time & more efficiency comparable 2 b4, he just knows that hes gaining something, so he wont do what he done b4 learning it. therefore, most veteran photoreaders dont want any other proof. lets take the worst scenario: photoreading is a scam, LSC are total cons
..still ill use it in the same way or alter the system because i gain much more from the metarial this way.
Raanan Hadar
