I really don't understand those kinds of people that demand six pieces of evidence before they believe that fish have gills.... you can deny any evidence, claim that it was a fabrication, a government conspiracy, etc, etc... I am not making it up when I say that there are people who believe that the moon doesn't exist, and no matter what kind of evidence you give them, they'll say that it's all special effects, a govt. conspiracy, a fabrication....
how much proof is enough??
"Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers."
-- Bernard Haisch, astrophysicist and editor of the Journal of Scientific Exploration.
[This message has been edited by BubblesOfEvil (edited July 19, 2001).]
