Hello, This is my first posting on your Forum. I have spent the last few days going through the forum in hopes to get an understanding to what I have signed up for, and try to get a flavor of the questions I myself may face while starting the photoreading program.
What attracted me to this program was the similarities it held to what I already grew up knowing. I knew growing up, that the mind stores everything it has ever scented. This was something I learned back around first grade. From that understanding, learning to me has always been a myth, but one that I knew no other way around. I knew that true learning was nothing more then recalling information which was already stored in the mind. Spell a word correctly once, the skill and ability has already been established. This understanding was emphasized while learning WuShu. One thing which stood out like a sore thumb was the Chinese concept of "no mind". That only further assured things which I felt to be true all along. (no, I am not Asian, I am a pure blooded Californian, native even)
I am very hopeful and extremely non-skeptical, that the processes taught in photoreading will success as presented. I can only hope that my effort will not get in my way of success. I can go on about my ultimate goals with starting this process but I will leave that for another post, another time. On to my question.
Subliminals where understood and used in advertising for many years. From the water droplets forming the word "sex" to the backwards masking in many popular songs. Apparently this got so far out of step that laws where passed to prevent them from occurring (this is not something I know as fact, but something I had heard.)
When the PhotoState is obtained, does that subject the mind to a much greater state of suggestibility? What made subliminal so diabolical was that they would bypass the mental filters and store their information in the mind like an intruding virus. Taking from what I read from Sidis
"if in two hypotheses the consequences are the same, the two hypotheses may be considered as identical for all purposes of further reasoning."
(Yes I had to ready that statement a few times to understand)
With that, what form of warnings, failsafes or education has been provided by Learning Strategies to its customers concerning the hyper-suggestibility of the mind during a photostate? I freely admit my own ignorance to you concerning your program. I am not a physic major but a life long student.
If I have missed a post which already addresses this question then to all, my apologies,
Thank you for your time and I look forward to the lessons ahead,
BlkWolf
