It is evident that you do not understand the underlying purpose of my request.
I am not trying to "prove" anything and am not engaged in a "seeing is believing" exercise. Rather, I have only asked for the most commonly used "currency" in retail merchandising, namely, a referral to a fully satisfied customer. Most successful business enterprises (including mine as an attorney)owe a large measure of their success to the objective endorsements of satisfied customers and clients.
I am not interested or worried about losing money; the course guarantee covers that. Rather, my focus is more positive. I am only interested in determining if there is another person like myself (a professional who uses printed material extensively in pursuit of their career)who has succeeded in increasing his or her reading skill to a level of only half of the "advertised" rate. [I would trade my mother's bones if I could read at that level!]
I fully recognize that people learn at different rates and that there are numerous variables at work. My decision to proceed further and continue to work with the PhotoReading program is not an issue. I fully intend to do that. But that determination should not serve to make my inquiry regarding a possible contact with a satisfied customer irrelevant. If my search for an objective evaluation by someone who has been successful with the program proves to be an exercise of futility, common sense will certainly raise a cautionary flag.
Think about it. Before investing hundreds of hours of time in a project of improving my reading skill by a factor of 35 [I currently read at about 300 wpm X 35 = 10,500 wpm] involving a very unique and seemingly innovative product, what is wrong (where is the harm) of asking if anyone else has completed the same project [or one that was very similar] successfully?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Steve
