All I'm saying is that if you want "a referral to a fully satisfied customer" all you have to do is post the message "Any satisfied customers?"
But how can I believe that's what you want when I see this:
Topic Name: "SEEING IT WORK FIRST-HAND IN TAMPA-ST.PETERSBURG"
Followed by: "If someone can show me that they have attained a super-human reading skill..."
Then you say: "not engaged in a "seeing is believing" exercise"
First you say: "Since I just spent a couple of hundred bucks for the tapes and learning manuals, that's the least I can do for myself!"
Then you say: "I am not interested or worried about losing money"
I guess what got me upset was this:
You say: "In other words, I am interested only in working with someone who is totally objective."
I say: "If you want to see an unbiased, realistic portrayal of PRing, get the news video. It's free, which is cheap enough for everyone! http://www.learningstrategies.com/PhotoReading/Video.html"
To which you replied: "It is evident that you do not understand the underlying purpose of my request."
I understand that you're now saying you're not looking for proof, you want an unbiased, satisfied customer who has achieved the ability to photoread what was advertised, which was three times faster than he currently can. The reason I said to get the video is because it is common debate on here that the infomercial is misleading, and that when you said "read at a rate of between 8,000 and 12,000 words per minute...which is less than half of the reading rate "advertised"" I got the conclusion that you were mislead into thinking that in Photoreading you are to read at 25,000 words per minute. This is misleading. You PHOTOread at 25,000 wpm, and will have absolutely zero comprehension. You get comprehension upon activation, which takes more time.
Trying to help. Get the news video.
