Forums IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ PhotoReading, Memory Optimizer SEEING IT WORK FIRST-HAND IN TAMPA-ST.PETERSBURG

Free, unlimited coaching support is provided to anyone applying themselves on how to integrate the PhotoReading system, via toll-free number and email.

damn there are some smart people in this forum. nice reply anonymous (not that i'm saying that i liked what you said (which i did) but i liked the way you said it).

GIVE THE ATTORNEY A BRAKE. YOU HAVE TO BE A PROFESSIONAL TO UNDERSTAND Stephens. HE JUST WANTS TO BE CERTAIN THAT THE TIME HE IS GOING TO SPEND IS WORTH IT. I'M AN ACCOUTANT, SO I UNDERSTAND WHERE HE IS COMING FROM. TIME IS MONEY. OPPORTUNITY COST IS VEY HIGH. I CAN BE MAKING MONEY INSTEAD OF READING AND PRACTICING SOMETHING THAT IS NOT GOING TO WORK. GET IT!!!!! ALSO, anonymousman I DON'T THINK YOUR REMARKS ARE THAT CLEVER. YOU JUST REPEATING WHAT STEPHENS SAID LIKE HE IS RETARDED OR SOMETHING.....

Hi Stephens B. Woodrough,

I am a Chiropractor and I use PRing on all my reading material. It's a fabulous system and I don't know what I would do if I didn't have this tool available for me to use. Invest the time and learn the system. You will like the results.

Good luck in your pursuits,
Gregory

I'm sorry you don't think I'm clever. That said, further comment from me to you is useless.

(hehehehehehe)

Gregory:

Thank you for your encouraging comment. Are you located anywhere in Florida, or is there a possibility that you may visit Florida in the near future? If so, please give me a call.

Giancarlo hit the nail on the head: my time (and yours also) as a professional is the equivalent of money. While the cost of the PhotoReading course materials is covered by the purchase guarantee, the investment of a hundred hours (or more) of my time represents a very substantial sum and, of course, is not covered by the guarantee.

I should add all of the discussion regarding my motive for wanting to meet personally with a person who has learned the techniques of the PhotoReading course and applied those techniques successfully in the pursuit of their career is puzzling. I was very surprised by the instant "aggressiveness" and "adversarial" tone of some of the responses to a rather simple (and common)request. Why are they so defensive over my desire to meet someone who has been successful with PhotoReading? Very strange reaction. The answer to that question, of course, is irrelevant to my objective, which is to enhance my reading and comprehension skills. Thus, I will decline any further discussion of that issue.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Steve

P.S. In response to the person who questioned the sincerity of my offer to pay the expenses of a meeting, my intention is to prepay the person's transportation and overnite lodging (if needed) expenses as well as those for meals.

Steve,

I was able to get the gist of the course and have some success with it in under 10 hours or so, and every hour spent on it after that was basically getting better at it. Don't worry about the time factor, even if you don't do so hot, it won't be in the hundred hours factor, and 10 hours failing at something for me isn't too bad when I consider the amount of time I spent watching Pokemon.

Good luck with it!

-Ramon http://razor.ramon.com

Ramon:

Thank you for your encouragement. I have only spent about 8 hours listening to the tapes and working the exercises. [I first received the program materials last Friday afternoon.] I have already made a mental committment of 40 hours; but if twice or three times that number is required, I will probably need some form of reassurance - such as meeting personally with someone who has been successful.

You are probably correct that I should not have to spend a hundred hours to develop the enhanced reading skills promised by the PhotoReading program. Here again, however, this is another illustration of the kind of information I am seeking. How many hours of working with the program are generally required to enhance reading skill by a factor of 10, by a factor of 20, or by a factor of 30 (which is my goal)?

I fully recognize, of course, that we are all different and that none of us learn at the same rate. On the other hand, if we assume certain constants such as level of formal education, experience and maturity, professional career disciplines, etc., I would think that a general "norm" would emerge that would show the amount of time and effort required to achieve such goals. It is certainly an important and valuable piece of information that will be very useful and helpful to me if the person who provides the information is objective and: (1) has an educational background and professionsl career characteristics similar to mine, and (2) has a demonstrated proficiency of an enhanced reading skill that approaches my goal. Some might say: Why is the second component necessary? Technically speaking, it's not; however, it unquestionably magnifies and underscores the credibility of the information.

Thanks again for your comment.

Steve

Steve,

Be careful. An enhancement of 30 fold is troubling me.

Please remember the difference between Photoreading and reading. While you may photoread at 25,000 words per minute, this number cannot be translated to normal reading, since time spent photoreading is minimal in comparison to the other steps...for this reason I would phrase differently your request to see someone who can read at 12,000 words per minute.

The speed at which you actually photoread doesn't even really matter, which is why I dislike that they say "Photoread at 25,000 Words Per Minute", because to someone who sees that advertised will think they will read at that speed. In actuality, you can Photoflip through a book in 5 seconds, then repeat several times and reach somewhere probably in the range of 100,000 words per minute being photoread, but that's a terrible way to guage it at, since you still have activation left to do, and postviewing if not done already.

This is why I usually use a comparison of how long something would take me to read normally versus photoreading. I say something along the lines of "It took me a 3 hours to finish this 400 page book...not bad."

If you meet someone who has mastered photoreading, please be don't be prepared to see them read at 12,000 wpm. Prepare to see them photofocus, and go through a book, then do a lot of activation procedures.

-Ramon http://razor.ramon.com

Plus, looking at it now, a factor of 30 (if by factor I assume you mean multiplied) is actually way way too high. If a book takes you 10 hours to read normally, a factor of 30 is I believe expecting to actually read the book in 20 minutes, which is much too fast.

-Ramon http://razor.ramon.com