You know, Steve, as I was typing it I was thinking the same thing..."Couldn't you just recalculate and come up with an average?" I said to myself...."Hmn..." I replied to myself. "Hey, plus spending 25 minutes actually looking at a book (not counting incubation time) really isn't that unbelievable is it? I mean the photoreading book itself says you'll get the gist in 25 minutes" "Hey...hmn..you're right"
Yeah, I'm pretty sure if you divide it out, you'll get a high wpm number, but haven't figured out what that number is for me yet.
And on second thought, some people can spend only 25 minutes PRing a book and doing procedures and get the gist of it (not counting incubation time).
So basically I just screwed up my entire post. 
-Ramon http://razor.ramon.com
