Les,
I don't know how many times we have to stress this, Les.
PRing and Reading are two completely different things and have two different uses.
Secondly, I'm rapid reading the book and underlining, so I'm still saving time over regular reading and underlining, so it's not necessarily different, is it?
And if I was regular reading and not underlining, I would've missed the same things.
In other words, you haven't made a point.
Mikali,
Completely agree. I've mentioned before that I refuse to PR some books like the Tao te Ching and Millman's books (although "No Ordinary Moments" is getting rapid read now...this book is kinda crappy).
I've never underlined before, and yes, it definately anchors information down. My only complaint is I've anchored too much info...like, I've circled every time a number is nmentioned, and there's a pattern, but it doesn't seem there's a point to the pattern. So I wasted a lot of time on that and other connections.
But I'm definately getting a lot.
-Ramon http://razor.ramon.com
-Ramon http://razor.ramon.com
[This message has been edited by razordu30 (edited February 20, 2002).]
