Let's not stray off topic: my question hasn't been answered for about two days now, so I'll put it in bold.
Why is it that PRing the bible is any less effective than regular reading the bible. Your whole thread "Heed Christians..." warns us not to PR the bible, because it's somehow less effective. Please tell me why.
You stated:
"Do you understand that Jesus died on the Cross, was buried, and rose again the 3rd day according to the Scriptures. If you have PhotoRead the Bible and understand that, then what does that tell you/all that you/we must do?"
If you PR'ed the bible and didn't know that Jesus died on the cross, was buried and rose again on the third day, then you are a HORRIBLE pr'er. The point I'm making is that whether you PR the bible or regular read it, you'll get the same message, and that what you DO with that message is entirely irrelevant to how you got it.
I guess what I'm trying to say is (and please don't take offense to this) that I'm starting believe that you used PRing as an excuse to state your beliefs, and while I have nothing against stating your beliefs, I think that you did so in a way that's kind of irrelevant to the topic you posted.
-Ramon http://razor.ramon.com
