As I stated in a thread under "Does PR truly work?" I would like to see studies done on photoreading itself. This is not because I don't believe that it has helped/will help people with the reading process but because I think it deserves to be better understood. The subconscious is truly a complicated subject. If we could establish more about PR--what conditions does it work best in? Does hypnosis affect the efficacy? What are the usual EEG measurements for somebody who is successfully performing PR?-- than everyone involved will be all the better. Furthermore, such studies would most definitely be a boon to marketing, and the wider educational-world might take Photo-Reading a bit more seriously. In short, scientific studies are not just a nuisance, or for the die-hard skeptics, they are for the benefit of human knowledge.
Kristoff Olafsson
