Forums IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ PhotoReading, Memory Optimizer For Pete and those who don't believe

I have a lot of things to say but I will try to be as brief as I can.

I bought the program about 8 months ago after I saw the infomercial with Pete Bissonette.

I have 2 jobs and 3 kids so it has been really difficult for me to do the program.

I went through the whole program (and it took me like 6 months just to do that!) and I have been trying to do the 5-day photoread-a-book program but I have had no time.

Anyway, my point is this: I BELIEVE PHOTOREADING WORKS!

Why do I believe? easy my 10 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER and her mother both Photoread!

They don't live with me (we are divorced) and they live overseas, but my daughter comes with me for 2 weeks every year.

2 years ago my daughter came and she demonstrated as she photoread the Harry Potter book from beginning to end in less than 3 hours!
With 80 % accuracy, get this, UPSIDE DOWN!

Her mother photoreads and activates 1,000 pages books in less than 4 hours with the same accuracy.

IF an 8-year-old can do it, I think there's still hope for a 30 year old like me.

WHY we fail, for every person is different but for me is because I have to beat 30 years of training that tells me that I have to read EVERYTHING or I am not learning, That tells me that I HAVE TO SOUND EVERY WORD in my mind to read, etc.

How do they do it, I asked my little girl and she said "I read from my eyes to my brain, not from my eyes-to my ears-to my brain" she said. I think she still doesn't understand about Conscious-subconscious minds yet and I did not want to go any further.

So if anyone come to my face and tell me it doesn't work when I am looking at the proof in a 10 year old! all I have to say is that you are wrong and Paul is right.

And one last think, it really makes me so mad that her reading teacher gave her a B because when they go to reading class they have to read one chapter every morning and she finishes the chapter in about 5 minutes when the other students finish in 45 minutes or more.

The teacher told her she needs to read word-by-word and sound-the-words or else she is not reading CORRECTLY! What a nerve. That's the kind of negative training we have to beat! in my case 30 years of bad training, and I don't expect to beat it overnight.

Keep trying one day we old people will get it, and then we can teach it to our kids.

Good luck.

Solarus:
Excellent post by the way!!!!!
Did your daughter and ex-wife go to the photoreading seminar or did they use the homestudy course????

3D:

You are going to laugh, my ex and I only stayed together for 2 years (we had personality problems you know) And although I knew she could "READ FAST" that's what I called it then 10 years ago, I didn't know she could photoread, I didn't even know the meaning of that word.

I never asked her HOW she did it, and she never told me, it was never in our conversation during those 2 years.

They we separated and like I explained before I didn't know that she had thought our daughter to do it, and it was a big suprise to me 2 years ago when I knew my daughter could "READ FAST" a book and upside down.

I asked my daughter and her answer was "I read from my eyes to my brain, not from my eyes to my ears to my brain" that's the answer I got from an 8 year old girl, so I didn't ask any further.

It wasn't until last year that I so Pete's informercial on TV, and (it's like one of those aha! feeling you get) I went aha! so that's how they do it.

Before I bought the course I asked my daughter a lot of questions, and all the answers matched what Pete had said in the infomercial, so I bought the program the following day.

I didn't ask my ex because we had a fight and haven't spoken to each other for 2 years now.

Wow!
Thanks for sharing that with us.
Your daughter sounds amazing.
Bit scary though: imagine a whole generation of hyperintelligent accelerated learning ten year-olds that are gonna take over the world!!!! lol.

Nick

Solarus:
You're last post indeed made me laugh, but I understand where you are coming from, with the ex-wife and all. Been there myself. But the reason that I ask is because Subliminal Dynamics has a similiar course where you mentally photograph the book UPSIDE DOWN.

quote:

---

Originally posted by nickuk:
Wow!
Thanks for sharing that with us.
Your daughter sounds amazing.
Bit scary though: imagine a whole generation of hyperintelligent accelerated learning ten year-olds that are gonna take over the world!!!! lol.

Nick

---

Oh...you have NO idea! MUA HA HA HA HA HA!!

Yeah, I know kids ruling the planet, that will be something!

Regards.

They are most open and most capable. Which is why people keep skills like these away from them. Damn society. I'm sure if you stress a kid enough, they can get their pHD by 10 or 12. Notice, "if".

Anyhow...

PR w/o activation is a sin or what? lets say... you read bunch of random physics books, they you go and activate your textbook for physics. OK or no?

quote:

---

Originally posted by nickuk:
Wow!
Thanks for sharing that with us.
Your daughter sounds amazing.
Bit scary though: imagine a whole generation of hyperintelligent accelerated learning ten year-olds that are gonna take over the world!!!! lol.

Nick

---

Yes, and what force is controlling these children?

(No, I do not take anti-Potterism seriously).

Go for it Chang Liu! PR'ing w/o activation is fine--direct learning is PR'ing a ton of books on one topic w/o activation.

I do it all the time--try PR'ing 3-10 books a day w/o activation--you can activate any of them if you want.

Try Freenoting about a unactivated book--loads of fun.