Huh? I didn't say peripheral vision was bogus! I am asking for scientific evidence of a claim PhotoReading makes that has been negated by modern science. Perhaps if you reread my post without PR, you would have realized I acknowledged peripheral vision exists. In fact, it was quite important to the survival of your ancestors once Apollo had finished pulling the sun across the sky.
Although I have experienced the course, I have yet to waste a dime on PR, nor do I intend to. I already read at least two books a day just fine thank you, at near 100% comprehention. Why would anyone with an eidetic memory be jealous of a PR adherent? Remember, I am only here to help YOU, Patti!
