Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#39952 12/25/03 08:06 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 55
Now, I have a question for anyone that knows

Since most of us operate at Beta and when we use PR, we're at Alpha, what would happen if we drop to Mid Theta? Does anyone even know how effective low brainwaves are for Photoreading?

I am in the process of experimenting new photoreading strategies and tactics. One of the major concerns or focal points is the area of brain actvities.

So, does anyone know how much brainwaves effect Photoreading, especially at Mid Theta?

Now I can reach Theta more commonly!
Havent tried that experiment...if no one replies then I will try it myself....

I put a lot of energy in droping brain wave cycles to Theta level.

If its anything, I tried to Photoread at Theta

Result-I should have made more clearly defined goals

lol....

Anyway, as for the recent debate over RG and PR, I have concluded....

That I could not believe how much filler words we have in English.

Each book and its contents should be treated like a library...hence the need for goals.....you "check out" books from the library [super read/dip] and dont ever return it...[I owe 120 for 2 books since 3rd grade!]

The real difference between regular reading and pring is that they are the same....except that pring saves you more time cuz the same time that u spend covering irrelevant info, could be spent covering 20 times that amount if you pr and the chances of finding relavent info, is higher.

I'm in the middle of many new projects that I have launched and some of the results are favorable, some just suck.

Anyone that can help, I will send back the results and method of how to do a certain technique according to the topic you helped with. =D

-kenji






#39953 12/25/03 12:09 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,351
Administrator
Administrator

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,351
quote:
Originally posted by Kenji:
Now, I have a question for anyone that knows

Since most of us operate at Beta and when we use PR, we're at Alpha, what would happen if we drop to Mid Theta? Does anyone even know how effective low brainwaves are for Photoreading?


Actually you have made an incorrect assumption. We photoread at high theta, low beta with next to no alpha brainwave pattern during the process.

Paul has shown this numerous times in his classes by connecting people to an IVBA (beginners first and experienced users of the system when time permits) to show them that thier brainwaves go right where it has to for photoreading if you just follow the outlined steps.

quote:
I am in the process of experimenting new photoreading strategies and tactics. One of the major concerns or focal points is the area of brain actvities.

I trust you already have the system working for you by doing the steps as given that way you can record what happens when you change your methods. The method that Paul teaches works when people apply it. It's when they start looking for shortcuts that folks have trouble with the system.

quote:
So, does anyone know how much brainwaves effect Photoreading, especially at Mid Theta?

As already explained it's high theta, Mid theta will be harder to reach if your physically moving. The same reason I suspect we still have low beta activity whilst photoreading. I believe it's the brains method of ensuring you avoid physical injury by being aware enough during physical activity.

quote:
Now I can reach Theta more commonly!
Havent tried that experiment...if no one replies then I will try it myself....

Follow the step Paul has provided, get into photofocus, notice the blip or the patterns of white and click you're there.

quote:
I put a lot of energy in droping brain wave cycles to Theta level.

Funny it requires *less* energy to be at theta.

quote:
If its anything, I tried to Photoread at Theta

To try is to set yourself up for failure either do or do not do.

quote:
Result-I should have made more clearly defined goals

lol....


It's so much easier to define your goals if you know your purpose. What't the longer term outcome you expect from your efforts?

quote:
Anyway, as for the recent debate over RG and PR, I have concluded....

That I could not believe how much filler words we have in English.[/b]


The English language has more words than any other language, German comes a close seconf having at least 30,000 words fewer than English. The average person uses a select volcabuary of about 10,000 words which is less than 10% of the words available in the English language.

quote:
Each book and its contents should be treated like a library...hence the need for goals.....you "check out" books from the library [super read/dip] and dont ever return it...[I owe 120 for 2 books since 3rd grade!]

With each book you are getting information from at least one person who has collected his or her ideas from many other people. Do you really want to spend time with that person for their knowledge?

quote:
The real difference between regular reading and pring is that they are the same....except that pring saves you more time cuz the same time that u spend covering irrelevant info, could be spent covering 20 times that amount if you pr and the chances of finding relavent info, is higher.

The real difference between PR and regular reading, is that PhotoReading consist of a strategy using more of your mind to get to the real information that you need faster and with a focus. Regular reading is a hit or miss affair where you might be lucky to have your mind open to the information without censoring it as you read.

quote:
I'm in the middle of many new projects that I have launched and some of the results are favorable, some just suck.

Good luck with them

quote:
Anyone that can help, I will send back the results and method of how to do a certain technique according to the topic you helped with. =D
-kenji

As do I.

Alex

[This message has been edited by AlexK (edited December 25, 2003).]






#39954 12/26/03 05:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 63
Member
Member

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 63
I see where you're going. Trust me, most clever beginners want to fine-tune the system to make it even more effective. The truth is, it's already designed at it's optimum level, and like AlexK says, it's impossible to be in mid-Theta and photoread: This is particularly true to me as mid-theta is more of the level reached when you are in quiet meditation, beta movements make the coordination of PR and mid-theta impossible.

I think you're hitting the same realization as I did when activation started working for me, I realized it was not what I had glorified the whole thing as and felt a bit bitter for everyone making it sound like you're truly reading at the speed of sight, or the mumbo jumbo of "25,000 wpm mininum". However the more you PR and Activate, the faster you're mind because in-tune with the whole process. I believe at an expert level, the PR strategy truly becomes a skill to be reckoned with as your subconscious improves comprehension to a level within a shortened time that regular reading truly can't merit against.

Cheers and have a happy new year!






#39955 12/27/03 07:03 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,351
Administrator
Administrator

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,351
Ah yes, Wishful thinking that PhotoRead 25,000 per minute = reading with comprehension at 25,000 per minute

Since I never fell into that false belief to start with I learnt the system rather quickly.

Now well, some books are finished with after a photoread. I know I don't want anymore out of them after that, soooo, I guess while it's not reading it's pulling in the information at 25,000 wpm and understanding after having built that body mind connection, that I don't need a conscious comprehension of the book. That to me is pure brilliance after having weeded my way though books and text and finshing them and saying what a waste of time this author didn't tell me anything I didn't already know.

The mystery now is. Did I or didn't I know this before I photoread it?

Alex







Moderated by  Patrick O'Neil 

Link Copied to Clipboard
©, Learning Strategies Corporation, All Rights Reserved
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.33 Page Time: 0.034s Queries: 21 (0.009s) Memory: 3.0066 MB (Peak: 3.5951 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-09-17 22:04:31 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS