Unfortunately it was a printed article provided by a friend, as such I can't provide a link. It was titled 'A Preliminary Analysis of PhotoReading: No Sign of Magic' It conducted a series of tests comparing Photoreading to traditional reading. "for the expert PhotoReader, there was a substantial loss in efficiency for all three texts, more time was spent reading per correctly answered question when using the PhotoReading method as compared to reading the texts normally"..."As the trainee, I experienced this false feeling of confidence myself, particularly for the topic texts. After reading each of the texts, I estimated that my comprehension was as good as that for the texts read normally. For each text, after having PhotoRead the text, I read the text quickly using the rapid reading technique that I learned in the PhotoReading course. I then rapid read the text again at that point believing that I was ready to take the comprehension test. This over-confidence clearly led me astray given the evidence from my low comprehension scores for these texts" both of these are typical quotes from the article I am sorry I could not provide a more complete view of the study presented.
