That report would be invalidated by the scientific community as inconclusive.
Fault lies with the fact that the Trainee was also the researcher. One cannot consider that unbiased.
Another fault is that only 2 people were subjects... Again a biased sample.
One of the subjects was a PhotoReading Instructor... again biased. A Experienced PhotoReader no longer "regular reads" So you have no comparison of their before and after results.
Education level and interest of these two individuals are not factored in, along with ages... again a biased representation of the world as a whole.
You have to factor in the human intention. If the human intends to ride a motor cycle through the air over 10 cars chances are he will do it. the 100,000 spectators sitting in the stand cannot and wouldn't try.
Alex
