Photoread4me.
My points are merely
- that it doesn't take years to become profient. (You said that it took Paul and Pete years to get to this level or profiency in PhotoReading that is misleading since they learnt it quickly too. It's taken a few years to make other aware of there protentials but it was through the use of his photoreading skill that that Paul has created so many fine and unique courses to further human potential.)
- Some books do some books don't need activation, that's for the individual to decide.
- It is possible to learn and get a degree by photoreading books only but the thing is those people learnt to activate the books, had nothing to lose by trying it that way, (They didn't have time to study and would fail so photoreading was better than nothing they still accepted possible failure).
- PhotoReading and not activating... ironically some people do get it and can do exactly that, they have to try it and see. And they will also notice that it doesn't happen always happen usually the activation comes from questions... it doesn't always matter who asks the questions.
quote:
What i am trying to get you to see here is that it is a unreasonable expectation to think that a novice or beginner or someone just starting to learn Photoreading should be expecting the same type of results as Paul Scheele the creator of Photoreading who spend years to get to that point. Photoread4me
No it's not unreasonable...
what is unreasonable is to expect that kind or result from merely listening to the course and not actually doing anything toward learning, experimenting and discovering your own potential. It's easy to overlook the fact that we applied our knowledge first and experiemented to see what more we can do.
Alex
