I have always taken analytical reading to be critical reading. A style of reading where you are thinking through each idea presented and identifying its range of veracity and also checking if the logical sequence of ideas presented is correct, sufficient and sometimes if necessary to support the authors conclusions.
This style of reading requires much analytical thought while taking in the information.
Photoreading is a great system for taking in the information quickly. It is also useful to use with matterial that is to be read critically. Having the overview of an argument as well as knowing the final destination can help limit the range of critical thought and save time. Good writing will often provide its own critical review or discussion of limitations after arriving at the conclusions. Knowing this can save you the time of redoing the work already presented by the author.
I have read many books where I was open to the conclusions or the premise used by the author, but I did not accept the argument presented to justify the use of the concepts. Using PRWMS, as a first step, on the books would have helped significantly by allowing my to apply the appropriate level of critical reading. Note critical reading is slower than even traditional reading.
You are perfection.
Iam2 
