I would like to see this test done in collaboration with LSC, with a good number of various people, both expert and non-expert photoreaders and see what the results yield.
For the misconceptions about PhotoReading, I think we can blame LSC for giving the process such a provocative title and using the number 25,000 so much. What do they think people are going to think when they say "PhotoRead at 25,000 words per minute!"
I mean, really. They know what people are going to think. They do it catch eyes and ears and sell their product. As much as I like LSC and the PhotoReading Home Study course, they deserve criticism for their intentional provocation of potential customers which can be, at times, misleading.
