I guess what I don't understand is the need that some people seem to have to disprove Photoreading. When I wanted to learn to read faster I read the testimonials of some who had tried Tony Buzan's methods of speed reading. I tried it myself, it didn't work for me. I did the same the thing with Evelyn Wood's methods. Again, it didn't work for me. Next, I tried Photoreading. It did work for me.

It sounds like you wasted a lot of time and money. Doesn't it bother you that those authors may have been conning the public?