I was wondering how much emphasis a photoreader should put on each individual word, especially when it comes to superreading. I notice that when I do, I have a choice to zoom in on words that catch my attention, but those are merely single words that may or may not have a useful context to my purpose. Otherwise, I can superread with little expectation on what I should be looking for, not consciously looking for any particular word, and then I get these urges to read certain parts of the text. At least this makes me feel like I'm working with my subconscious mind more.
But another question slightly related is, when you rapidread, do you try to eat up all the words thoroughly or blaze through in a rather nonchalant manner? I'm experimenting, and think I'm getting close to what's comfortable. Perhaps it's different for each book I read? :/
