The question is WHY did Paul sign/put John's name to the book...without asking him??
I think it's pretty obvious that this was done to bolster evidence that NLP was used as the basis for PR.
This NASA study ain't going to happen, it's trotted out each year whenever someone asks about studies, I was actually waiting for someone to allude to it, and on cue.....
The Vicary reference is hilarious.
Is there any prood, apart from anecdotal, or some truly dodgy radio show/ black and white TV program showing how Paul is photoreading.
It's really about as believable as offering proof of teleportation by showing an illusionist walking through the great wall of China, ONE demonstration is all there seems to be of PR's powers.
C'mon you have to admit this house of cards falls down at the slightest breeze of serious investigation.
Given the massive amounts of questions about every process by people who OWN the latest revision of the book which are posted here, I would have thought it may have covered these areas more, rather than just incrementing the revision number without any important updates.
From literally reading every single post on here, over the years from the archive, I've yet to see any proof that PR works, or that it isn't being confused with speed reading.
The challenge has been put out and refused with ridiculous 'I don't need to demonstrate how good PR is' responses when speed reading VS PR competitions have been raised.
And yet the book is still being sold and the courses stil be charged for, yet apparently PR is not worth defending.
