Hi Jason,
Anecdotal evidence from the author with some rather sad examples in his book, coupled with very few people here having any success all of who may or may not be working for learningstrategies without any positive studies, is, I hope you agree, worthless.
I can see why LS are not keen on this report to be made available. I was wrong about the Nasa study 'perpetually being in the works' I had no idea it was buried.
Specifically, it's a house of cards because its basic premise seems to be founded upon misinformation, made up references and dodgy 'proof' from long ago (radio and tv)
Bring it up to date, if it was worth demonstrating years ago, why isn't it worth it now?
Paul has abandoned PR and seems to be making money with all sorts of other ventures (Feng Shui, for God's sake)
Can you state that Dr J MB was not offered any money to join forces? What has his joining forces brought to LS, IE how has his input changed the PR book that Paul wrote?
Ok, when they DO update the book, my question will be answered, until then it remains very poorly revised.
I AM looking for evidence, though it seems that when there is it's buried (Nasa) . Please point me to where some studies have been performed.
Anything that is asking for money from people, almost demands defending.
I'm not sure why you just wrote a very long response, defending PR, yet claim you don't see the need to.
PRing a book/PDF online is quite amusing, IE why wouldn't you just use search or in a book an index?
Anyway thanks for replying, I look forward to hearing the spin Alex will put on this.
