Quote:

For instance, I doubt that remote viewing works as such. But what I do think is that the techniques of remote viewing may have value. They may develop intuition or the imagination. They may help an individual to learn how to pick up signals from their body or information from various intelligences at work in them, perhaps? Maybe it's like image streaming? Who knows?



This is really the crux of the problem. Areas of scientific research are governed, consciously or unconsciously, by people’s beliefs.

If you believe in RV, why do you believe? If you do not believe in RV, why do you not believe?

There is a fictional movie called Suspect Zero about the FBI using Remote Viewers to track serial killers. I don’t recommend the movie because it is very dark and disturbing, but I do recommend the extras portion of the movie on DVD. The director of the movie went to visit a Remote Viewer for a demonstration. The Remote Viewer would not do a demonstration, he insisted the director of movie try it himself. What follows on the DVD is amazing. Was this faked for the movie? Perhaps.

People who “know” that RV does not work, are saying that not one time has it every work. And they haven’t done their homework. The US government spent over $30 million dollars on its own Remote Viewing program through the CIA and the defense department. Jimmy Carter once announced to the press that we used RV to find a downed US pilot and plane in the jungles of Central America (or was is South America?). And there are many more…

Some of us have actually done RV and made it work. People here may accuse me of gullibility; however I can assure you than I am always look other possible solutions, more grounded solutions. However, when all other possible explanations have been eliminated, the last remaining explanation must be true, no matter how unlikely.