Hi, I am new to this site, and having recently purchased abook by paul r scheele I was very interested in this 'photo reading' and that lead me to this forum.

At a first glance through the book, I was almost convinced photo reading at a rate of 25000 wpm + was possible. As a 15 year old high school student, I was eager to learn such a skill, as no doubt a method like this would be a great aid in my revision for important exams.

BUT - the next day I was feeling a little sceptical, and decided to see what Wikipedia, normally a reliable source of information, had to say about it. (See here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoreading ) Now I am really regretting I did, because it has completely destroyed any hopes I had that photo reading was real and possible.

So basically I need some motivation, not from people THINK they know it works, but from people who KNOW it works because they use it themselves.

Kind regards,

Kaze

Last edited by Alex K. Viefhaus; 02/07/07 03:47 PM.