I too am curious about Kevin's success with the program, because it really didn't do much for me.
I can get imagery like crazy no matter what, but what a field of windmills, for instance, has to do with a particular problem is beyond me. I guess I am not good at interpreting...?
The way I see it is that, yeah, I think that a lot of times our visual intelligence is trying to "tell us" (show us) something that is in response to the question, the trouble is interpreting this information accurately with the verbal/cognitive intelligence.
I can free associate to the imagery I get in terms of possible meanings like crazy, but whose to say that I'm on target? Usually, I'm not. I mean, the free association may produce some interesting, creative, and useful stuff, but it's not the communication of some visual inner genius.
I've found it pretty frustrating, personally.
So, I'd love to hear from someone for whom it works really well and compare notes.
