"PhotoReading and normal reading require a similar amount of time to complete"
To conclude the study, McNamara noted that, "In terms of words per minute (wpm) spent reading, there was no difference between normal reading (M = 114 wpm) and PhotoReading (M=112 wpm)" (10). So why is it that so many people tout photoreading? In her conclusion, McNamara states that, "One aspect of the PhotoReading technique is that it leaves the reader with a false sense of confidence."
I got this off wikipedia.. Now I'm having doubts because why would this person lie. Also I read the report, makes me even more sad.
