Hi, 'seasoned'!!
What/how much do you remember when are reading at the customary 300 wpm generally 'tied' to an mirrored reading dialog in your fore-conscious mind?
Actually, if I read THAT slowly, I can remember quite a bit. Even reading much faster than that I can do ok.
Most classic reading is tied to the pace of speaking via ones inner dialog. Useful for ruminating or assimilating in a tractor like mode where you 'push' forward through...
Yeah, I started doing that around the age of 6 or so, and CAN turn it off. I don't have to think in English.
I still use it, after I photoread, have pre-viewed and double verified that subject material is critical for immediate use. Like programming, mathematics, writing out philosophy.
That's disappointing. 8-(
Right now I am digesting an advance 1800 page manual on ACCESS 2007 so to develop, write and use a new software I have had in mind, to develop for a long while. Yet I have never used this program before.
Why don't you use VB? In some ways it is EASIER, and it IS more flexible.
PhotoReading and the processes before and after do this for me.
Open the way to get through a vast amount of info very quickly. In order to light upon this program, I first also PhotoRead four other competing computer manuals to affirm this fifth one was good to go. That is some 5000 plus pages of programming manuals, just recently. (different software applications)
Before photoreading, no way. I bought them, briefly pet them and then lost track of them. This way I cover tens of thousands of pages of very complicated material and zone right in to what I need, slow it down and use it within days, both on paper and at the computer.
I have never been so delighted at such possibilities. Everything I do has always been self-taught and last few months have been the equivalent to progress of years prior.
Anyway, I just love 'legal disclaimers'. ( I kind-of collect them
)
Here is one:
"Please proceed at you own risk. All statements and examples are not intended to represent or guarantee that everyone (read you) will achieve the same results. (as mentioned here) Each individual's success will be determined by his or her desire, dedication, background, health, personal application, effort and continued motivation to work and follow the generously provided 'recommendations'. There is no guarantee you will duplicate the fine results of some of those mentioned. You recognize any endeavor personal or professional has an inherent 'risk' of failure, loss of applied time and even ones patience."END OF DISCLOSURE:
Thus caps the fine state of our legalized culture!
Yeah, but the idea was about their not stating that they had instantaneous activation. Although the disclosure avoids legal repercussions, the idea of instantaneous activation IS implied.
