Yes, my first and second link in my message are to http://www.qigonginstitute.org, the first one was supposed to be a book review, and the second one being their page of links to studies and article. Actually, both are the same: their page of links. I just used the LSC handy dandy toolbar--the first tool being "create a link to a webpage".

http://www.qigonginstitute.org/html/papers.php

My first link, also from the qigonginstitute articles & studies page was supposed be this one:
http://www.qigonginstitute.org/html/Chen/Qi_Review1.htm

This article is the one I referred to as outlining the problem of why as Shawn so elagantly puts it, "most won't cut it".
The article, "A Criticism of Qigong with Pseudoscience Method-- Book Review of [u]Qigong: Chinese Medicine or Pseudoscience?["/u] by Kevin Chen, Ph.D. MPH is an excellent article and review and really lays out the problems I spoke about, which is my long-winded and much less elegant way of saying, "most won't cut it". ;\)

I especially direct people to look at Dr. Chen's points, 3 & 4, as he points out the problems with this "debunker's handbook"

Just FYI to anyone reading this thread.

Also much love,

Steve

 Originally Posted By: Shawn_Grim
You can dig around in here, although most won't cut it.
http://www.qigonginstitute.org/main_page/main_page.php

Much Love, Shawn


blessings,

Steve