So you would recommend using few lists which we ought to use often for fresh information. I may be a little in the thoughts of old mnemonics tricks now, but wouldn’t you end up with many thins on one peg. So for instance when you think of the anchorman you would get tons of associations…. Hey –that’s a good thing I just realized, - I though you would be very confused, but as Vera and Paul discussed, when you toss a coin into the well and listen quietly, you can hear the water respond. However if you through a coin in the sea, you get trouble hearing the coin hitting the water. When you choose to look into a specific auxiliary thread like the anchorman, you’re actually choosing a specific well to toss your coin in, - making a much better changes of noticing the hit, than looking into the Pacific. Nonetheless you must also be specific of what you wish for, because the lager the well is, - the harder it gets to find the answer you’re looking for, - if it hasn’t yet been a part of the foundation, meaning the long term memory…
So in a way I think it has to be a balance between you ability to use the search light and the size of the field you’re looking into.
Please elaborate if I still don’t get it Sandy!
