I myself have the photoreading course, but it is always good to look at things objectively and hear other perspectives. Has anyone seen this study by NASA that disproves photoreading?

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20000011599_2000009345.pdf


Wiki also has this to say (based on references):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_reading#PhotoReading