I don't want to be bashing LS here over this NASA study. I'm just looking for an answer. For the record, I have a lot of respect for this company. They put out some great products. And as far as studies go, NASA or not, this one really sucks! There are two test subjects in the study, one of them being the author! That can't be very impartial. The number of test subjects (2 or maybe just 1; how can the tester be a test subject!?) is far too low for this study to have any real validity.
I'm sure the people at LS just roll their eyes when they see this come up and I can't very well blame them.
Anyway, the bottom line is, the NASA study on Photoreading is at best questionable and most likely invalid!
Maybe LS should do a study of its own to put this to rest? It would certainly add valuble data to the PhotoReading product.
Last edited by focuskid; 07/14/11 02:54 AM.
