quote:
Originally posted by Pete Bissonette:
It comes down to personal preference and belief (if your belief is that you can't PhotoRead without your glasses, then you should wear them).
You are at an advantage ... when one focus's on text, more than likely the conscious mind is involved ... ya know the analytical side of the mind.
By taking off your glasses, and not being able to focus, this should help to involve the sub-conscious more easily. The ideal situation to be in!
Of course, the blur may not be recognized by the mind and may process the material as something totally different! IE you PR a book on computers but information is read as something having to do with accounting ... now your in trouble!
But what it boils down to is ... as Pete reiterated, you should be 'comfortable' with the process.
Humbily,
Michael Saikali
quote:
Originally posted by Michael Saikali:
Allehhm,You are at an advantage ... when one focus's on text, more than likely the conscious mind is involved ... ya know the analytical side of the mind.
By taking off your glasses, and not being able to focus, this should help to involve the sub-conscious more easily. The ideal situation to be in!
Of course, the blur may not be recognized by the mind and may process the material as something totally different! IE you PR a book on computers but information is read as something having to do with accounting ... now your in trouble!
But what it boils down to is ... as Pete reiterated, you should be 'comfortable' with the process.
Humbily,
Michael Saikali
Michael:
Can you express your comments in another way?? What you are saying sounds GREAT!!! but I don't follow what you are saying
But he is also worried that your mind won't be able to properly process the information that is being photoread (why? because without your glasses your vision isn't as clear. So what might be going into your subconscious mind might not be comprehendible because its out of focus.)
A lot probably depends upon how bad your eyes are. My glasses are really strong so I personally have to read with them(unless peripheral vision is different Pete?). I am curious now about whether the rods and cones in the inner eye are effected differently by nearsightedness.
Nevertheless what I am trying to say is that if you decide to use your glasses maintaining the blip will become easier over time. It really does become second nature with practice (although it can be a challenge in the beginning).
Humbily,
Michael Saikali
quote:
Originally posted by weight39doug:
I think what he means is that you would have an advantage without your glasses in that you won't be to conscious of what you are reading (why? because you can't see it as well so your critical mind won't be getting in the way trying to analyze the information you are photoreading.)But he is also worried that your mind won't be able to properly process the information that is being photoread (why? because without your glasses your vision isn't as clear. So what might be going into your subconscious mind might not be comprehendible because its out of focus.)
A lot probably depends upon how bad your eyes are. My glasses are really strong so I personally have to read with them(unless peripheral vision is different Pete?). I am curious now about whether the rods and cones in the inner eye are effected differently by nearsightedness.
Nevertheless what I am trying to say is that if you decide to use your glasses maintaining the blip will become easier over time. It really does become second nature with practice (although it can be a challenge in the beginning).
So then the only issue would be a persons belief structure. If you believe that you can read without your glasses then its possible. But if that capability is not compatable with a persons beliefs then the conscious mind would sabotage the results (the mind doesn't want to make a person into a liar so it with limit its capabilities according to its beliefs).
Cool.
I am extremely new to the photoreading idea, having only received the book last friday, although I've been looking into the idea for about the past 3 years!