So after writing a post about needing motivation, I think maybe the post itself helped motivate me. I thought, hey I should just get up and try the process again on books that truly interested me. I went to the bookstore (thanks for the tip) and PR-ed some of the popular books.
I did some longish (30-40 minute) passes on a couple books and felt like I was absorbing them. It was amazing how quickly the system came back to me after not having used it in a while. Some books one pass was enough, others sparked my curiousity more. Either way, it's a much more efficient way of reading -- getting what you need out of it.
However, it left me with a disconcerting question: what happens when what you need out of a book doesn't interest you? Most books it seems that I do for pleasure only require a couple passes and the system works beautifully. But whenever I need to read a book for academic purposes -- I need details, full comprehension, ability to infer what the author means but isn't writing, etc. Do you just keep doing passes and mind mapping until you get the level of detail you need? Often times I see people in class who have underlined text and use it when discussing something in class. Because my academic system (U.S. university) praises quoting a text over broad understanding, this seems to work well for them. Meanwhile, I can photoread a book, understand the main point a lot better than them, but may not be able to pin point a certain quote. Thoughts?