The media buyers do not want to publicize the schedule, because they do not want to tip off media buyers of other infomercials.
====
Dana's comments about spontaneous activation hit it right on the head. Tonight I took one our instructors from Germany, Evelyn Wild, to the orchestra in the Twin Cities. When I was driving her back to Paul Scheele's house, where she was staying, we talked about her personal PhotoReading experiences.
She says PhotoReading has dramatically changed her life. She can suck information from books whenever she wants. More importantly, though, she PhotoReads everything and she continuously surprises herself with what she knows. She might be in a meeting with client and she find herself contributing information and facts she should not have known. That's like what Dana was describing.
She told me of a college student who she spoke with last week. He was studying a biology text book (I think that was the subject) for a test the next day. He quit studying because the information seemed so familiar, that he already knew it. He then aced the test. He attributed it to PhotoReading, because he had never had that feeling of familiarity about his school work--he would always study until the last minute.
I asked Evelyn if learning PhotoReading was easy for her. She said initially she was trying to perfect PhotoReading by doing everything just right. She said she was frustrated and got very little benefit. As soon as she let go of the need to do it right, she blossomed with it. That experience led her right into our German instructor training course!
===
So many people ask, "How can I do what you do on the infomercial." Like Evelyn discovered: do not force it.
Develop your PhotoReading skills step by step. Enjoy your successes along the way. Stay curious. Remain upbeat and positive. Give yourself a break.
===
Remember, PhotoReading at 25,000 words a minute is not the same as "reading" at 25,000 words a minute. Most people think of reading as having conscious knowledge of the information as you go along. You can't do it at those speeds.
When I PhotoRead on the computer screen on the infomercial, I did not know what was going on while I PhotoRead. Not at all. It was all a blur of text streaming in front of my eyes.
When they asked me questions, images began emerging in my mind and I described the images. It was like a mind probe. When I answered the first question, I still did not know what the story was about. When they asked the next question, I had more images emerge, and I described them. Had the process continued, I would have eventually put the story together. If I wanted it sooner, I would have had to activate the story just as I would a book.
===
There is nothing magical about PhotoReading. From the beginning Paul and I have always been fascinated at now complex people make PhotoReading. It is a simple system for processing information.
A beginning PhotoReader can go through information three times faster than they could without PhotoReading.
It is not unusual for beginners to question whether the "PhotoReading" step works. Well, if you look for any pieces of evidence that the PhotoReading step works, you will probably find it. Build on it.
If that's not for you--maybe you talk yourself out of believing the evidence had anything to do with PhotoReading--then try activating a book without PhotoReading it. You simply cannot get the level of comprehension or understanding in the same period of time (and if you do, you got lucky, so try it again).
A great test is to PhotoRead a horrible suspense thriller before bed, and notice your dreams.
