quote:
Originally posted by Alex K. Viefhaus:
Remember also that activation is done in layers. The best way to layer is have 2 to 3 questions seek answers, mind map, mind probe again. Ask yourself if you need to know more, if so what more do you need to know. Go in with questions and find answers again.
I feel like this advice is so good, and the layering idea was the break through for me about a year ago, but I didn't practice photoreading enough, so I never understood the system well until the past few months when I started PR-ing much more. I have a good grasp on the system I feel, if a bit shaky, and need to apply it to my school work. I have activated many non-school books with PR-ing, so I feel comfortable doing this.
However, it still seems to take a lot longer to photoreading books for school because of the intense detail needed. For instance, I'm reading a 14-page article right now about the evolution of religion. I did the previewing and Photoreading correct; complete with questions, trigger words, purpose, chants, etc. I have no problems with those steps.
When I do the multiple layer part - I'm not sure if I'm saving time. Each pass through the article takes about 4 minutes and mind-mapping I spend about 2 on. Having done 6 layers for this article, I feel like I know the information really well, and I love how it "gels". The problem is that 6 layers times 6 minutes (total) = 36 minutes, which I think is a long time for a 14 page article.
Since I can't really "regular read" like I used to, I'm not sure how long it would've taken me normally, nor what my comprehension would've been. All I can assume is that if it took me about the same time (more than 2 minutes per page) or less, I don't think my comprehension would've been as good as it is now through photoreading.
My question is: Do you think I'm taking too much time with the layering technique? Or should I expect this with dense material and appreciate the fantastic comprehension?
Also, my layering technique uses minimal dipping, a sentence or two only, but while superreading, I feel like I understand a lot of what is said, if not the details. Am I taking so long because I need to dip more and get a more "concrete" concious recall of the matter in shorter time?
Does it sound like I'm doing anything else wrong?
I hope my questions are clear enough, let me know if you're confused.
[This message has been edited by ked (edited March 30, 2004).]