Forums IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ PhotoReading, Memory Optimizer Photo Reading compared to Speed Reading

I hear you loud and clear ked, thanks for your comment!

Dark,

I read at 1500WPM at maximum normal-reading speed. I've never really taken the time to learn speed-reading.

Photoreading at 1500 is ridiculous. When you learn how to photoread, the rates of 25,000-70,000WPM comes into play. However photoreading really isn't a WPM category. It's more of a strategy that becomes almost god-like with practice.

I like your use of words Blackbox and it sounds as if Photoreading is far beyond just mere speed reading, perhaps you're right, you cannot compare Photoreading with speed reading because they're not even in the same category. Thanks for all your input guys, I really appreciate it!

what does everyone think of EYE Q at infmind.com.
I've tried it and practiced alot but I haven't improved that much.

Well you have to remember that's only a demonstration, so you cannot expect spectacular improvement by just doing the demonstration! I would say it would improve your reading speed if you were to purchase their program, but I'm interested in more of something in the lines of Photoreading where you get more out of reading. Those are just some of my thoughts.

eyeQ is the reason I read at 1500WPM.

However to increase in reading speed, you must understand that it is like walking up a pyramid. One step at a time. From 400 to 600, 600 to 1000, 1000 1500, and so on.

Imagine our brains as cars. We read at a certain rate yet our potentials are progressively higher than that which we sustain.

We have barriers that act as brakes to our cars. Affirmations, believe it or not, can greatly help with progress up the eyeQ reading curve. What keeps us from reading at optimal speeds is our programming. The programming that we obviously cant remember being done to us because we were infants at the time.

I assure you, there are plenty of children in Japan right now who can read at rates well above 100,000. It sounds crazy only because we're limited by our self-concepts.

No way blackbox!
100,000wpm? or 100.000wpm? If the first one is yes and true, please show me the link where you got that idea. I mean how can you read consciously 100,000? As far as I know speedreading is conscious reading. If the statement is false, that means your speedreading becomes unconscious level which will be just like photofocus step alone

Maybe 100,000wph? That is still fast!

Well I bought Eye Q and I was just wondering if someone could tell me if you can actually "Read" that fast?
Can the conscious mind actually handle that much information?
or, would it just be sort of skimming or something?
Would you combined both techniques?
PR SR (such as Eye Q, cause all other speed reading programs are nothing compared to this one)www.infmind.com

I haven't tried EyeQ before but is it really both PR and SR combined? I thought EyeQ was just SR?