Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#54220 07/10/00 03:30 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 9
Member
OP Offline
Member

Joined: May 2000
Posts: 9
I've read all about the 25K wpm speed that you can mentally photograph, but how quickly do you understand?

How long would it take an expert Photoreader to consume an entire physics textbook and achieve the same level of understanding as someone reading the traditional way.


#54221 07/11/00 01:15 AM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 6
Learning Strategies
Member
Offline
Learning Strategies
Member

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 6
A beginning PhotoReader should be able to process and understand information in 1/3 the time that he would have before learning PhotoReading.

And expert PhotoReader can cut that down even more.


#54222 07/11/00 01:42 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 9
Member
OP Offline
Member

Joined: May 2000
Posts: 9
Cut that down even more? How much more? I heard a figure like 12 to 14 times faster. Is there any truth in that?

A regular speed reading program could triple your speed, and you would instantly have access to the information, without activation. Plus you could get that for free from the library.


#54223 07/11/00 02:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 6
Learning Strategies
Member
Offline
Learning Strategies
Member

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 6
Expert PhotoReaders regularly get to 18 times.

PhotoReading does not triple your reading speed. Rather, a beginning PhotoReader will be able to get through materials three times faster than now--that includes activation.

During this period you will be going through the materials multiple times. That is why you are not reading three times faster.

It is a different paradigm than reading or speed reading.

Another thing is that your comprehension will be richer when using a system such as PhotoReading than you could ever hope to get with a speed reading course.

If you doubt it, put it to a head-to-head test.


#54224 07/12/00 05:10 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 130
Likes: 3
Member
Offline
Member

Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 130
Likes: 3
In my own experience I have found that speed reading was useful, in the begining, but it became very time consuming and sore on the eyes. To gain and maintain speed, it requires alot of effort and practice, without which your speed suffers. A huge advantage of PRing is that the photoreading step, can be done anywhere you read and if you practice this step alone over a very short period of time ie 1-2 weeks I have found the beginings of spontaneous activation. I tried this with a dictionary, I 'failed' at the dictionary game and thought what the hell, what happens if I'm not testing myself and just see what shows up..all I lose are a few minutes in my day..The end result was people were asking to spell words and give a defintion and I could without much hassel..verbatium has the dictionary..I wasn't able to do this with speed reading.

#54225 08/16/00 02:26 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2
is that why you misspelled hassle, mr. dictionary? LOL

#54226 08/16/00 03:09 AM
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 6
Learning Strategies
Member
Offline
Learning Strategies
Member

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 6
Yup. That's funny. Good work Drew!

It reminds me of the time we were demo-ing Paraliminal Tapes at a conference. We had a bunch of Walkmans along with a selection of Paraliminals. One lady took off the headsets and exclaimed, "This is great. It is the best tape I've ever heard."

A guy asked, "Which tape is it?"

She didn't remember and looked to me. I had no idea, so we opened the Walkman to find the Memory Supercharger.

The guy rolled his eyes and walked away.



Link Copied to Clipboard
©, Learning Strategies Corporation, All Rights Reserved
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 5.6.40 Page Time: 0.043s Queries: 28 (0.012s) Memory: 3.1672 MB (Peak: 3.5984 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-20 07:19:07 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS