I have a question. While I am sure PR will teach 100% comprehension by scent alone, I was reading about subvocalization. One "salesman" said it's very bad, slows you down, and should not be part of rapid reading. Another said to encourage subvocalization for increased stuff. What is the correct way to go? -Assuming subvocalization is the incomprehensible subvocalization way in the back of your mind: Concerning only processes w "traditional reading".
Thank you,
David
