Kristoff, if you're a proponent of absolute freedom, as you referred to in your most recent post, perhaps you should consider the words of Actual Freedom's founder in the first article presented on his site: "If one is driven by some force then one is not actually free". He goes on to reflect on how he was driven to push his ideas on others (including ideas about religion and non-religion), and how this approach inhibited his attainment of absolute freedom.
I just joined this forum today, with the goal of learning more about PhotoReading. I was under the impression this is a forum about reading, not religion. The Bible is a book. To some, it is just a book, while to others, it is more than a book. In either case, it seems the member who originally posted on the topic was referring to it in the simple context of the PhotoReading technique, not to prosthelitize Christianity or any other religion to the other members of the forum. If people choose to read the Bible during their PhotoReading exercises, let them. If they choose to read The Tao Te Ching or the Bhagavad Gita or the Vedic scriptures or the Koran or any other religious or spiritual text, it is entirely their choice. In the original post, the questions were related to the type of results the PhotoReading technique produces, not the validity of the contents of the Bible.
Someone who refers to absolute freedom in his post should know absolute freedom comes only through being responsible for your own actions while allowing everyone else to be responsible for their own. You control your reality. Let everyone else be free to control their own.
-Kristen
