Good post AlexK. I still have to wonder though, why don't we hear about double blind tests. Let's say ten subjects undertake the Photoreading course then Photoread a book and are asked questions later about the book? And another group who traditionaly read the same book and are tested with the same questions. A comparison is then made.
I think if I was advocating photoreading I'd try to offer some tangible numbers like this. The more testing, the more stats I'd be able to generate and the numbers would back me up.
Again, don't get me wrong, I beleive Photoreading is real even though it cannot be explained fully. But I think if I was offering something like this to the world I'd be compelled to show numbers like this along with my tesimonials. If anyting has held me back it would be this.
