If that were valid research PhotoReading would be gone. It is still here because the methods were investigated by the Minnesota Department of Education and a license was issued in May 1986.
Aside from the problem that that so called research is invalidated because the researcher was the trainee. That problem alone creates a conflict of interest.
The real glaring error in that research is it is investigating "reading at 25,000 wpm".
You do not read at 25,000 wpm. You PhotoRead at 25,000.
Based on that the research is not reseach.
Alex
