|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 327
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 327 |
Quote:
If the universe were left entirely to "scientists" we'd still think it was flat, and that the Sun rotates around the Earth. That's what scientists once thought.
Actually, such were the beliefs of ancient philosophers. Scientists were the ones who "corrected" these mis-beliefs. Also, believe it or not, the Flat Earth Society is still strong today, and their belief is based on authoritative scriptures, not on physical evidence (which science upholds above authority).
Quote:
Do we need science? Of course we do, but not as an orthodox church, fundamental and unbending. The best and most significant discoveries throughout the ages have always flown in the face of the "science" of the times, and sometimes resulted in the discoverer being jailed or even having his/her life threatened.
This is an amusing mixing of facts. First, science is not a "church." It is not anything remotely similar to a church. I believe I expounded on the distinction quite extensively in a previous post. To draw this analogy betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of what science is. Second, scientific discoverers have been persecuted by authoritative entities such as the Catholic Church. Validated scientific discoveries have always been honored and hailed by those within the scientific establishment. To suggest otherwise betrays a fundamental lack of historical knowledge.
Quote:
Bless the scientists, but also bless those who dare to question them.
What I find most amusing about this particular forum community is that there are hundreds of postings which laud and support the most far-out ideas, but at the same time, vehemently attack those who would rationally question these things. And these are the same folks who regard anything "scientific" as questionable and worthy of challenge. Gee, something seems seriously lopsided here!
Anyway, science THRIVES upon challenge, and it REQUIRES evidence. If only you could see it at work (rather than heed all that mis-information propagated by all those anti-scientific agenda pushers), you would be much less eager to tear it apart.
Personally, I've found that the average scientist is MUCH more honorable than the average mystic. In my experience, the former is more interested in discovering truth, while the later is more interested in bilking a gullible audience out of their money.
|
|
|
|
|
|