Oh God.
The moon landing was not fake. Each one of the arguments posed in the link you gave has an explanation, it's just that you and the author are too blinded to actually bother looking it up.
Found a small problem that's already been explained, but you haven't heard it? Oh, then the whole thing must be fake, no?
And if that's one of YOUR arguments for why photoreading doesn't work, get off the forums already ZMasterNCreator.
You're absolutely right jacktuff. Photoreading absolutely works, but you've got to be in fantasy land imagining it works.
haha i'd love to get off learning strategie's forum but they won't let me delete my account. I've even suggested for my account to be deleted and it hasn't been deleted eventhough I wrote a thread saying fuuck learning strategies corporation. I don't think this forum wants me to leave.
I already know photoreading is garbage and you cannot convince me or anyone that it works. Another thing you can't do is PROVE that it works.
I've spent almost 3 years on photoreading following all the steps and it didn't work. It's only my opinion and I don't expect you to take it to heart. The best thing you can do to see if photoreading really works is look for proof because proof shows it works.
I'll have a huge amount of respect for anyone to prove me wrong. If you can't then you can take your photoreading book and shove it along with the dictionary, tapes and other junk you've wasted your money on.
If you want to waste your money go to a casino. Atleast you get high off the oxygen that's pumped while you are playing games that can make you feel more alive especially when you lose.
